Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

IJT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IJT returned +15.4% to PDBC's +55.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IJT and PDBC

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.5bn for iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF and $8.0bn for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

At a glance
+15.4%
IJT total return, 1 year
+55.6%
PDBC total return, 1 year
0.18%
IJT expense ratio
0.59%
PDBC expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IJT costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 40.2 points; PDBC is 1.1 times larger.

IJT vs PDBC: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureIJTPDBC
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.4%+55.6%
Drawdown
Below its high8.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P SmallCap 600 Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.18%0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.5bn$8.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund9.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IJT and PDBC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IJT PDBC
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IJT
VIASAT INC 1.18%
PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 1.11%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES REIT 1.10%
TG THERAPEUTICS 0.97%
ETSY 0.91%
ALKERMES 0.90%
GLAUKOS 0.90%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP 0.88%
Only in PDBC
POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 19.37%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IJT iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Commodity ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.4% +55.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +15.6% (SLYG) +54.6% (DBC)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs SLYG +1.0 pts vs DBC
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.59%
Holdings 369 1
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.5bn $8.0bn

IJT and PDBC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IJT and PDBC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IJT

IJT tracks the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.6% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 369 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PDBC

PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +55.6% with distributions reinvested, against +54.6% for its benchmark, the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJT or PDBC?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJT returned +15.4% and PDBC +55.6%.
Which is cheaper, IJT or PDBC?
IJT is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IJT against PDBC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijt-vs-pdbc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.