Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or XLC?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and XLC returned −5.7%, so XLC returned more.

Which is cheaper, IBIT or XLC?

IBIT charges 0.25% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBIT vs XLC: how they differ

IBIT and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLC returned more over the year.

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBIT and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IBIT	Only in XLC
BITCOIN 100.00%	META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 20.39%
USD CASH 0.00%	ALPHABET INC CL A 11.85%
	ALPHABET INC CL C 9.46%
	AT+T INC 4.51%
	APPLOVIN CORP CLASS A 4.51%
	WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC 4.45%
	WALT DISNEY CO/THE 4.40%
	TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWRE 4.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

IBIT and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	XLC State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks an index of Communication services
Total return, 1 year	−31.1%	−5.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	−22.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.08%
Holdings	2	26
Net assets	$63.7bn	$22.4bn

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −5.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 72.5%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or XLC?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and XLC returned −5.7%, so XLC returned more.
Which is cheaper, IBIT or XLC?: IBIT charges 0.25% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBIT against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBIT against XLC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibit-vs-xlc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources