Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or MAGS?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and MAGS returned +11.2%, so MAGS returned more.

Which is cheaper, IBIT or MAGS?

IBIT charges 0.25% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBIT vs MAGS: how they differ

IBIT and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBIT and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IBIT	Only in MAGS
BITCOIN 100.00%	TREASURY BILL 65.41%
USD CASH 0.00%	Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%
	NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
	Apple Inc 4.12%
	Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
	Tesla Inc 4.07%
	Microsoft Corp 3.62%
	Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

IBIT and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Actively managed
Total return, 1 year	−31.1%	+11.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	−5.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.30%
Holdings	2	9
Net assets	$63.7bn	$4.7bn

IBIT in plain words

IBIT holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +11.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBIT or MAGS?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBIT returned −31.1% and MAGS returned +11.2%, so MAGS returned more.
Which is cheaper, IBIT or MAGS?: IBIT charges 0.25% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IBIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBIT against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBIT against MAGS, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibit-vs-mags Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources