Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IBB vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IBB returned +37.5% to XLG's +6.4%, and XLG charges 0.20% to IBB's 0.44%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IBB and XLGNet assets on Oct 27, 2026: $11.0bn for iShares Biotechnology ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLG costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 31.1 points; XLG is 1.1 times larger.
| Measure | IBB | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +37.5% | +6.4% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Biotech | S&P 500 Top 50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $11.0bn | $11.9bn |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99% | |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 50% | 60.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IBB and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IBB and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
By weight, 40% of IBB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 245 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +37.5% with distributions reinvested.
XLG
XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Are IBB and XLG in the same category?
- IBB is a thematic ETF and XLG is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, IBB or XLG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +37.5% and XLG +6.4%.
- Which is cheaper, IBB or XLG?
- XLG is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IBB against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-xlg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IBB against XLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-xlg
[IBB against XLG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ibb-vs-xlg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.