Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or PULS?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or PULS?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs PULS: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and PULS an actively managed short-term fund, and over the year PULS returned more, +4.2% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

FBTC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	PGIM
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Actively managed
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	−12.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.15%
Holdings	not filed	553
Net assets	$13.9bn	$16.3bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or PULS?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or PULS?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against PULS, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-puls Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources