Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs USO: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and USO a commodity futures fund, and over the year USO returned more, +105.9% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and United States Oil Fund, LP.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | USO United States Oil Fund, LP | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | USCF |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Holds oil futures |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +105.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | +89.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.45% |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | not published |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
USO in plain words
USO holds oil futures. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +105.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 57.4% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or USO?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and USO returned +105.9%, so USO returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or USO?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and USO charges 0.45%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against USO, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-uso Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources