Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or MAGS?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and MAGS returned +11.2%, so MAGS returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or MAGS?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs MAGS: how they differ

ETHA and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in MAGS
ETHER 100.00%	TREASURY BILL 65.41%
USD CASH 0.00%	Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%
	NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
	Apple Inc 4.12%
	Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
	Tesla Inc 4.07%
	Microsoft Corp 3.62%
	Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	Holds ether	Actively managed
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+11.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	−5.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.30%
Holdings	2	9
Net assets	$9.2bn	$4.7bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +11.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or MAGS?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and MAGS returned +11.2%, so MAGS returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or MAGS?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against MAGS, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-mags Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources