Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or FBCG?

In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and FBCG returned +16.5%, so FBCG returned more.

Which is cheaper, ETHA or FBCG?

ETHA charges 0.25% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 19, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ETHA vs FBCG: how they differ

ETHA and FBCG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

iShares Ethereum Trust ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ETHA and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ETHA	Only in FBCG
ETHER 100.00%	NVIDIA CORP 14.62%
USD CASH 0.00%	APPLE INC 9.64%
	ALPHABET INC 9.10%
	AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%
	MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%
	META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%
	BROADCOM INC 3.74%
	ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

ETHA and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 19, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	Holds ether	Actively managed
Total return, 1 year	−42.6%	+16.5%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−59.2 pts	−0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.57%
Holdings	2	214
Net assets	$9.2bn	$7.3bn

ETHA in plain words

ETHA holds ether. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −42.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 45.6% below its high of Aug 22, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ETHA or FBCG?: In the year to Sep 19, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ETHA returned −42.6% and FBCG returned +16.5%, so FBCG returned more.
Which is cheaper, ETHA or FBCG?: ETHA charges 0.25% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so ETHA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETHA against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 19, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETHA against FBCG, data as of Sep 19, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/etha-vs-fbcg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources