Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMB vs SCHD: how they differ
EMB and SCHD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.
iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMB and SCHD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EMB | Only in SCHD |
|---|---|
| BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84% | QUALCOMM Inc 6.75% |
| EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50% | Texas Instruments Inc 5.92% |
| UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42% | UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10% |
| ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34% | Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96% |
| GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31% | Merck & Co Inc 3.87% |
| CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28% | Chevron Corp 3.84% |
| REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27% | Verizon Communications Inc 3.66% |
| ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond | US dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.8% | +27.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.7 pts | +10.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 612 | 99 |
EMB in plain words
EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.
SCHD in plain words
SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMB or SCHD?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMB or SCHD?
- EMB charges 0.39% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against SCHD, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-schd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources