Which returned more over the last year, EMB or ILF?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or ILF?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs ILF: how they differ

EMB and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in ILF
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.61%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 8.00%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.71%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.33%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	GRUPO MEXICO B 6.02%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 5.94%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.24%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	CREDICORP LTD 3.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+33.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+15.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.47%
Holdings	612	47

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or ILF?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or ILF?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against ILF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against ILF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-ilf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources