Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
DIA vs FBTC: how they differ
DIA is an equity index fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year DIA returned more, +13.5% against −31.0%.
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Fidelity |
| What it is | Tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 31 | not filed |
| Net assets | $45.5bn | $13.9bn |
DIA in plain words
DIA tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 5, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DIA or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DIA returned +13.5% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so DIA returned more.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIA against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dia-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources