Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or NOBL?

In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and NOBL returned +9.9%, so NOBL returned more.

Which is cheaper, FBTC or NOBL?

FBTC charges 0.25% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 21, 2026.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FBTC vs NOBL: how they differ

FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and NOBL an equity index fund, and over the year NOBL returned more, +9.9% against −31.0%.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

FBTC and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	Fidelity	ProShares
What it is	Holds bitcoin	Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year	−31.0%	+9.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+16.6%	+16.6%
Gap to the S&P 500	−47.6 pts	−6.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.35%
Holdings	not filed	69
Net assets	$13.9bn	$11.3bn

FBTC in plain words

FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or NOBL?: In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and NOBL returned +9.9%, so NOBL returned more.
Which is cheaper, FBTC or NOBL?: FBTC charges 0.25% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBTC against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against NOBL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-nobl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources