Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs SIVR: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +58.1% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | abrdn |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Holds silver |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +58.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | +41.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.45% |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | not published |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
SIVR in plain words
SIVR holds silver. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +58.1% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. It sat 43.2% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or SIVR?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and SIVR returned +58.1%, so SIVR returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or SIVR?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and SIVR charges 0.45%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against SIVR, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-sivr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources