Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs PDBC: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and PDBC an actively managed commodity fund, and over the year PDBC returned more, +52.6% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Invesco |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Actively managed |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +52.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | +36.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.59% |
| Holdings | not filed | 2 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $7.9bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
PDBC in plain words
PDBC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +52.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or PDBC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and PDBC returned +52.6%, so PDBC returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or PDBC?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and PDBC charges 0.59%, so FBTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against PDBC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-pdbc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources