Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
FBTC vs ONEQ: how they differ
FBTC is a spot crypto ETP and ONEQ an equity index fund, and over the year ONEQ returned more, +19.2% against −31.0%.
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
| FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| What it is | Holds bitcoin | Tracks the Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | −31.0% | +19.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −47.6 pts | +2.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.21% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1022 |
| Net assets | $13.9bn | $10.8bn |
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FBTC or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FBTC returned −31.0% and ONEQ returned +19.2%, so ONEQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FBTC or ONEQ?
- FBTC charges 0.25% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBTC against ONEQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fbtc-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources