Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MBB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and MBB returned −0.1%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGDV or MBB?

CGDV charges 0.33% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGDV vs MBB: how they differ

CGDV and MBB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares MBS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGDV	Only in MBB
Microsoft Corp 5.81%	BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 7.26%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66%	GNMA2 SF 30YR 0.09%
Broadcom Inc 5.16%	GNMA II 30YR SF - JUMBO-CONFORMING 0.08%
Alphabet Inc 3.60%	GNMA2 SINGLE FAMILY 30YR 0.04%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33%	GNMA II 30YR 0.03%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15%	GNMA2 30YR TBA(REG C) 0.03%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12%	UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.03%
General Electric Co 3.08%	FNMA 30YR UMBS MEGA REMIC SUPER 0.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

CGDV and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital Group	iShares
What it is	Dividend Value	Mbs
Total return, 1 year	+18.7%	−0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+1.2 pts	−17.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.33%	0.04%
Holdings	53	2599

CGDV in plain words

CGDV is an index equity fund tracking the Dividend Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.8%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or MBB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.7% and MBB returned −0.1%, so CGDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or MBB?: CGDV charges 0.33% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGDV against MBB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGDV against MBB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-mbb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources