Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
AGG vs FBTC: how they differ
AGG is a bond index fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year AGG returned more, −0.4% against −31.0%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.0 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 13428 | not filed |
| Net assets | $137.3bn | $13.9bn |
AGG in plain words
AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 18, 2026.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.4% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so AGG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or FBTC?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources