Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
BIL vs FBTC: how they differ
BIL is a short-term Treasury fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year BIL returned more, +3.7% against −31.0%.
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | State Street | Fidelity |
| What it is | Tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −12.9 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 19 | not filed |
| Net assets | $48.1bn | $13.9bn |
BIL in plain words
BIL tracks an index of 1-3 month T-bills. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BIL or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BIL returned +3.7% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so BIL returned more.
- Which is cheaper, BIL or FBTC?
- BIL charges 0.14% a year and FBTC charges 0.25%, so BIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIL against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bil-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources