Data as of Sep 21, 2026.
BINC vs FBTC: how they differ
BINC is an actively managed equity fund and FBTC a spot crypto ETP, and over the year BINC returned more, +1.9% against −31.0%.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core fund | Core fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Fidelity |
| What it is | Actively managed | Holds bitcoin |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.9% | −31.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −14.7 pts | −47.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.25% |
| Holdings | 4719 | not filed |
| Net assets | $16.4bn | $13.9bn |
BINC in plain words
BINC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned +1.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4719 positions, with the top ten at 22.1%.
FBTC in plain words
FBTC holds bitcoin. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 it returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for the S&P 500 and +21.8% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 35.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2025 on Sep 18, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or FBTC?
- In the year to Sep 21, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +1.9% and FBTC returned −31.0%, so BINC returned more.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against FBTC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/binc-vs-fbtc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources