Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs XRT: how they differ

DGRO and XRT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and XRT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and XRT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROXRT
WALMART INC0.95%1.27%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP0.52%1.29%
TJX COMPANIES INC (THE)0.42%1.22%
KROGER COMPANY (THE)0.17%1.17%
EBAY INC0.13%1.42%
ROSS STORES INC0.12%1.24%
DICKS SPORTING GOODS INC0.08%1.43%
TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY0.07%1.39%
PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC0.03%1.36%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES INC0.02%1.17%
MURPHY USA INC0.01%1.19%
LITHIA MOTORS INC0.01%1.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in XRT
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Groupon Inc 1.78%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%RealReal Inc/The 1.75%
APPLE INC 2.94%Bath & Body Works Inc 1.73%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Warby Parker Inc 1.64%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Upbound Group Inc 1.59%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Coupang Inc 1.55%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Maplebear Inc 1.55%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Revolve Group Inc 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and XRT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
XRT
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Retail ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore Dividend GrowthSPDR S&P Retail
Total return, 1 year+17.4%−3.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−20.6 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%22.5%
Holdings39475

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

XRT in plain words

XRT is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Retail. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −3.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 16.1%. It sat 12.2% below its high of Nov 16, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or XRT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and XRT returned −3.0%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or XRT?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and XRT charges 0.35%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and XRT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 22% of XRT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against XRT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against XRT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-XRT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources