Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs VBK: how they differ

DGRO and VBK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and VBK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROVBK
HUBBELL INC0.07%0.20%
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC0.04%0.51%
LINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC0.04%0.41%
DOMINO'S PIZZA INC0.04%0.28%
GRACO INC0.04%0.35%
NORDSON CORP0.04%0.45%
TEXAS ROADHOUSE INC0.04%0.36%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC0.04%0.24%
A.O. SMITH CORP0.03%0.20%
JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES INC0.03%0.28%
EVERCORE INC0.03%0.18%
ITT INC0.03%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in VBK
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
APPLE INC 2.94%Astera Labs Inc 1.05%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Natera Inc 1.04%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91%Twilio Inc 0.88%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.78%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%nVent Electric PLC 0.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DGRO and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore Dividend GrowthSmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%10.2%
Holdings394545

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and VBK returned +13.8%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or VBK?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources