Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs VBK: how they differ

ACWI and VBK hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and VBK hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and VBK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIVBK
EMCOR GROUP, INC.0.04%0.52%
EQT CORPORATION0.04%0.23%
FLEX LTD.0.03%0.42%
CASEY'S GENERAL STORES, INC.0.03%0.83%
INSMED INCORPORATED0.03%0.33%
HUBBELL INCORPORATED0.03%0.20%
NATERA, INC.0.03%1.04%
Astera Labs, Inc0.03%1.05%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd0.03%1.27%
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION0.03%0.36%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION0.03%0.79%
Everpure, Inc0.02%0.70%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in VBK
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
APPLE INC. 4.02%nVent Electric PLC 0.77%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%ATI Inc 0.76%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%TechnipFMC PLC 0.74%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%MasTec Inc 0.74%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 0.74%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Woodward Inc 0.71%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ACWI and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI ACWISmall-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−3.7 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%10.2%
Holdings2307545

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or VBK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and VBK returned +13.8%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or VBK?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so VBK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and VBK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 10% of VBK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources