Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs SPMO: how they differ

DGRO and SPMO hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and SPMO hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROSPMO
BROADCOM INC3.25%7.58%
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%2.78%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON2.64%3.85%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.73%2.02%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC1.94%1.29%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)1.80%1.21%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE)1.19%1.43%
CITIGROUP INC1.12%0.97%
MORGAN STANLEY1.28%0.96%
CATERPILLAR INC0.79%2.60%
GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.78%0.83%
RTX CORP0.69%1.40%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in SPMO
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Micron Technology, Inc. 10.72%
APPLE INC 2.94%NVIDIA Corp. 8.46%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Alphabet Inc. 4.81%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%Alphabet Inc. 3.81%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%Intel Corp. 2.95%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 1.90%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.84%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRO and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%100.0%
Holdings39499

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or SPMO?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources