Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs SPHD: how they differ

DGRO and SPHD hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and SPHD hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and SPHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROSPHD
EXXON MOBIL CORP2.91%1.55%
DUKE ENERGY CORP0.73%1.59%
EOG RESOURCES INC0.53%1.99%
FIFTH THIRD BANCORP0.35%1.33%
DTE ENERGY COMPANY0.22%1.54%
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC0.17%1.70%
EVERGY INC0.14%1.70%
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY0.12%1.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in SPHD
BROADCOM INC 3.25%Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05%Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
APPLE INC 2.94%Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.92%Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64%Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
ABBVIE INC 2.53%Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32%VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 2.08%ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DGRO and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesInvesco
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−8.9 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.30%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%95.7%
Holdings39449

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or SPHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or SPHD?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and SPHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 96% of SPHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources