Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRO vs KRE: how they differ
DGRO and KRE hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and KRE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRO | KRE |
|---|---|---|
| M&T BANK CORP | 0.21% | 1.35% |
| EAST WEST BANCORP INC | 0.12% | 1.28% |
| ZIONS BANCORP NA | 0.06% | 1.33% |
| CULLEN/FROST BANKERS INC | 0.06% | 1.35% |
| SOUTHSTATE BANK CORP | 0.06% | 1.31% |
| POPULAR INC | 0.05% | 1.33% |
| PROSPERITY BANCSHARES INC | 0.05% | 1.30% |
| WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORP | 0.05% | 1.28% |
| BANK OZK | 0.04% | 1.29% |
| COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (MO) | 0.04% | 1.34% |
| HOME BANCSHARES INC | 0.03% | 1.31% |
| WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP | 0.03% | 1.32% |
| Only in DGRO | Only in KRE |
|---|---|
| BROADCOM INC 3.25% | Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc 1.37% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.05% | Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37% |
| APPLE INC 2.94% | Citizens Financial Group Inc 1.37% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 2.92% | Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.91% | Associated Banc-Corp 1.36% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.64% | First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35% |
| ABBVIE INC 2.53% | Fulton Financial Corp 1.35% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.32% | Webster Financial Corp 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | KRE State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Core Dividend Growth | SPDR S&P Regional Banking |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +16.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | −1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.7% | 6.7% |
| Holdings | 394 | 161 |
DGRO in plain words
DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 394 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.
KRE in plain words
KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or KRE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and KRE returned +16.1%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRO or KRE?
- DGRO charges 0.08% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRO and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DGRO-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources