Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWI vs KRE: how they differ

ACWI and KRE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWI and KRE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACWI and KRE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACWIKRE
Truist Financial Corporation0.07%1.27%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED0.04%1.33%
M&T BANK CORPORATION0.04%1.35%
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.0.03%1.37%
REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION0.03%1.34%
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.0.01%1.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ACWIOnly in KRE
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.89%Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp 1.37%
APPLE INC. 4.02%UMB Financial Corp 1.37%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 2.90%Glacier Bancorp Inc 1.36%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.58%Associated Banc-Corp 1.36%
ALPHABET INC. 2.26%Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc 1.35%
BROADCOM INC. 1.90%First Interstate BancSystem Inc 1.35%
ALPHABET INC. 1.87%Fulton Financial Corp 1.35%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 1.73%Webster Financial Corp 1.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

ACWI and KRE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
KRE
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Regional Banking ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI ACWISPDR S&P Regional Banking
Total return, 1 year+19.1%+16.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+1.6 pts−1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50061.4%6.7%
Holdings2307161

ACWI in plain words

ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.

KRE in plain words

KRE is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Regional Banking. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 7% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 161 positions, with the top ten at 13.6%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or KRE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and KRE returned +16.1%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWI or KRE?
ACWI charges 0.32% a year and KRE charges 0.35%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWI and KRE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 61% of ACWI and 7% of KRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWI against KRE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against KRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-KRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources