Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BWET vs HYG: how they differ
BWET is a commodity fund and HYG a bond index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +2.9%.
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
| BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Breakwave | iShares |
| What it is | Tanker Shipping | US high yield bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | +5129.6% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5112.1 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.49% |
BWET in plain words
BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or HYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and HYG returned +2.9%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against HYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-HYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources