Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
AGG vs HYG: how they differ
AGG and HYG are both bond index funds, and over the year HYG returned more, +2.9% against −0.7%.
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.
| AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | US high yield bonds |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | +2.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% |
AGG in plain words
AGG is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
HYG in plain words
HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, AGG or HYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −0.7% and HYG returned +2.9%, so HYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, AGG or HYG?
- AGG charges 0.03% a year and HYG charges 0.49%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against HYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-HYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources