Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BWET vs GLD: how they differ

BWET and GLD are both commodity funds, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +19.1%.

Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and SPDR Gold Shares.

BWET and GLD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BWET
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerBreakwaveState Street
What it isTanker ShippingGold
Total return, 1 year+5129.6%+19.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5112.1 pts+1.6 pts
Expense rationot published0.40%

BWET in plain words

BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

GLD in plain words

GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BWET or GLD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and GLD returned +19.1%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BWET against GLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against GLD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-GLD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources