Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWI vs GLD: how they differ
ACWI is an equity index fund and GLD a commodity fund, and over the year they finished level, +19.1% against +19.1%.
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF and SPDR Gold Shares.
| ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | GLD SPDR Gold Shares | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI | Gold |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.1% | +19.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.6 pts | +1.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.40% |
| Holdings | 2307 | not filed |
ACWI in plain words
ACWI is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 61% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2307 positions, with the top ten at 24.6%.
GLD in plain words
GLD is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWI or GLD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWI returned +19.1% and GLD returned +19.1%, so ACWI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ACWI or GLD?
- ACWI charges 0.32% a year and GLD charges 0.40%, so ACWI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWI against GLD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWI-GLD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources