Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BWET vs EEM: how they differ
BWET is a commodity fund and EEM an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +32.3%.
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
| BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Breakwave | iShares |
| What it is | Tanker Shipping | Emerging markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +5129.6% | +32.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5112.1 pts | +14.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.72% |
| Holdings | not filed | 1245 |
BWET in plain words
BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or EEM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and EEM returned +32.3%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against EEM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-EEM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources