Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BWET vs DBMF: how they differ
BWET is a commodity fund and DBMF an equity index fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +25.4%.
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.
| BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Breakwave | iMGP |
| What it is | Tanker Shipping | iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy |
| Total return, 1 year | +5129.6% | +25.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5112.1 pts | +7.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.85% |
BWET in plain words
BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
DBMF in plain words
DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BWET or DBMF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BWET returned +5129.6% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BWET against DBMF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BWET-DBMF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources