Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or DBMF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or DBMF?

ACWX charges 0.32% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

ACWX vs DBMF: how they differ

ACWX and DBMF are both equity index funds, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +23.0%.

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

ACWX and DBMF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF	DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iMGP
What it is	MSCI ACWI ex U.S.	iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy
Total return, 1 year	+23.0%	+25.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.5 pts	+7.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.85%
Holdings	1759	not filed

ACWX in plain words

ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.

DBMF in plain words

DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or DBMF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or DBMF?: ACWX charges 0.32% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so ACWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACWX against DBMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against DBMF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-DBMF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources