Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BINC vs BWET: how they differ
BINC is an equity index fund and BWET a commodity fund, and over the year BWET returned more, +5129.6% against +2.0%.
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF.
| BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Breakwave |
| What it is | Flexible Income | Tanker Shipping |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.0% | +5129.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.5 pts | +5112.1 pts |
| Holdings | 4124 | not filed |
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
BWET in plain words
BWET is a commodity fund tracking the Tanker Shipping. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5129.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BINC or BWET?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and BWET returned +5129.6%, so BWET returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against BWET, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BINC-BWET Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources