Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ACWX vs BINC: how they differ
ACWX and BINC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and BINC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | ACWX | BINC |
|---|---|---|
| ENGIE SA | 0.17% | 0.10% |
| INTESA SANPAOLO SPA | 0.26% | 0.06% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 0.86% | 0.05% |
| DANSKE BANK A/S | 0.09% | 0.04% |
| LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC | 0.22% | 0.04% |
| NATWEST GROUP PLC | 0.17% | 0.04% |
| CENTRICA PLC | 0.03% | 0.04% |
| TOTALENERGIES SE | 0.51% | 0.03% |
| VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT SA | 0.07% | 0.03% |
| RENAULT SA | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| STANDARD LIFE PLC | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| BARCLAYS PLC | 0.23% | 0.01% |
| Only in ACWX | Only in BINC |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.69% | UMBS, TBA 5.13% |
| ASML Holding N.V. 1.54% | UMBS, TBA 2.81% |
| SK hynix Inc. 1.33% | UMBS, TBA 2.14% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 1.07% | UMBS, TBA 2.10% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.81% | UMBS, TBA 1.52% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.79% | iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02% |
| Novartis AG 0.77% | iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64% |
| Nestle S.A. 0.72% | UMBS, TBA 0.53% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI ACWI ex U.S. | Flexible Income |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.0% | +2.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.5 pts | −15.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | not published |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Holdings | 1759 | 4124 |
ACWX in plain words
ACWX is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1759 positions, with the top ten at 14.6%.
BINC in plain words
BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or BINC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +23.0% and BINC returned +2.0%, so ACWX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- How much do ACWX and BINC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 2% of BINC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACWX against BINC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ACWX-BINC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources