SVOL vs ZVOL: which moved less with stocks?
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026, ZVOL moved less with the S&P 500 than SVOL: correlation +0.65 against +0.74. Simplify Volatility Premium ETF and Volatility Premium Plus ETF.
SVOL costs 0.76 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; SVOL is far larger, $525m against $20m.
| SVOL | ZVOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.66% | 1.42% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $525m | $20m |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.6% | +24.9% |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.66: about 0.66% for each 1% | +0.85: about 0.85% for each 1% |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 0.92% | fell 0.77% |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
SVOL in the 21 weeks SPY fell, year to Oct 9, 2026: SPY averaged −1.18%, SVOL −0.92%.
ZVOL in the 21 weeks SPY fell, year to Oct 9, 2026: SPY averaged −1.18%, ZVOL −0.77%.
One strategy, two funds
SVOL and ZVOL both run a volatility strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Oct 9, 2026, SVOL’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.74 with the S&P 500 and ZVOL’s +0.65. In the 21 weeks the index fell, by 1.18% a week on average, SVOL averaged −0.92% and ZVOL −0.77%. Over the same weeks, SVOL finished 15.8 percentage points ahead of cash and ZVOL finished 24.6 points ahead of cash.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SVOL | ZVOL | SVOL | ZVOL |
| 3 months | +8.3% | +12.2% | +4.9 pts | +8.8 pts |
| 6 months | +17.5% | +25.9% | +2.3 pts | +10.8 pts |
| 1 year | +13.6% | +24.9% | −3.7 pts | +7.7 pts |
| 3 years | +28.6% | +32.6% | −57.2 pts | −53.1 pts |
| Since launch SVOL May 2021 · ZVOL Apr 2023 | +61.9% | +75.9% | −42.4 pts | −20.5 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SVOL in plain words
SVOL is a volatility fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.74 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.66, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.66% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 21 of those 52 weeks, by 1.18% on average. In the same weeks SVOL fell 0.92% on average, a down-week capture of 77.5%. Over the same 52 weeks SVOL returned +19.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 15.8 percentage points ahead of cash.
ZVOL in plain words
ZVOL is a volatility fund. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.65 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.85, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.85% the same way. In the same weeks ZVOL fell 0.77% on average, a down-week capture of 65.5%. Over the same 52 weeks ZVOL returned +28.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 24.6 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Which moved less with the S&P 500, SVOL or ZVOL?
- Over the 52 weeks to Oct 9, 2026, SVOL’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.74 with the S&P 500 and ZVOL’s +0.65, so ZVOL moved less with the index.
- Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, SVOL or ZVOL?
- In the 21 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.18% a week on average, SVOL averaged −0.92% and ZVOL −0.77%, so ZVOL returned more in those weeks.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, SVOL against ZVOL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/svol-vs-zvol
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). SVOL against ZVOL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/svol-vs-zvol
[SVOL against ZVOL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/svol-vs-zvol)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.