Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BTRN vs CTA: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CTA moved less with the S&P 500 than BTRN: correlation −0.26 against +0.21.

Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF.

+0.21BTRN correlation with the S&P 500
−0.26CTA correlation with the S&P 500
51.2%BTRN down-week capture
−78.5%CTA down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CTA scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

BTRN 53.1CTA 95.34.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BTRNFell 51% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell
CTARose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%CTA+0.97%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CTA+0.97%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

BTRN and CTA both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500 and CTA’s −0.26. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, BTRN averaged −0.64% and CTA +0.97%. Over the same weeks, BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash and CTA finished 10.1 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

BTRN and CTA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
BTRNCTABTRNCTA
3 months+7.5%+11.3%+5.3 pts+9.0 pts
6 months−0.7%+1.2%−18.8 pts−16.9 pts
1 year−13.9%+13.8%−30.5 pts−2.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+31.9%not published−46.5 pts
Since launch+7.3%+52.5%−42.9 pts−42.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BTRN and CTA on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerGlobal XSimplify
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.21−0.26
Beta to the S&P 500+0.31−0.47
Down-week capture51.2%−78.5%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.64%+0.97%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks−12.2%+13.7%
Against T-bills, percentage points−15.8 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.95%0.75%
ListedMar 21, 2024Mar 8, 2022
Net assets$2m$1.5bn

BTRN in plain words

BTRN is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.31% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks BTRN fell 0.64% on average, a down-week capture of 51.2%. Over the same 52 weeks BTRN returned −12.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash.

CTA in plain words

CTA is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.47, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.47% the other way. In the same weeks CTA rose 0.97% on average, a down-week capture of −78.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CTA returned +13.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, BTRN or CTA?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500 and CTA’s −0.26, so CTA moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, BTRN or CTA?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, BTRN averaged −0.64% and CTA +0.97%, so CTA returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, BTRN or CTA?
Over the same weeks, BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash and CTA finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, BTRN or CTA?
BTRN charges 0.95% a year and CTA charges 0.75%, so CTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTRN against CTA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTRN against CTA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/btrn-vs-cta Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources