Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BTRN vs HFMF: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, HFMF moved less with the S&P 500 than BTRN: correlation +0.20 against +0.21.

Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF and Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF.

+0.21BTRN correlation with the S&P 500
+0.20HFMF correlation with the S&P 500
51.2%BTRN down-week capture
12.7%HFMF down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: HFMF scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

BTRN 53.1HFMF 69.14.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BTRNFell 51% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%BTRN−0.64%Average week when SPY fell
HFMFFell 13% as much as the S&P 500
SPY−1.24%HFMF−0.16%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%HFMF−0.16%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

BTRN and HFMF both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500 and HFMF’s +0.20. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, BTRN averaged −0.64% and HFMF −0.16%. Over the same weeks, BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash and HFMF finished 5.0 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

BTRN and HFMF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
BTRNHFMFBTRNHFMF
3 months+7.5%+2.9%+5.3 pts+0.6 pts
6 months−0.7%−2.9%−18.8 pts−20.9 pts
1 year−13.9%+8.7%−30.5 pts−7.9 pts
Since launch+7.3%+14.1%−42.9 pts−10.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BTRN and HFMF on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BTRN
Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
HFMF
Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerGlobal XUnlimited
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500+0.21+0.20
Beta to the S&P 500+0.31+0.24
Down-week capture51.2%12.7%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell−0.64%−0.16%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks−12.2%+8.7%
Against T-bills, percentage points−15.8 pts+5.0 pts
Expense ratio0.95%0.97%
ListedMar 21, 2024Jul 15, 2025
Net assets$2m$23m

BTRN in plain words

BTRN is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.31, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.31% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks BTRN fell 0.64% on average, a down-week capture of 51.2%. Over the same 52 weeks BTRN returned −12.2% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash.

HFMF in plain words

HFMF is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.20 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.24, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.24% the same way. In the same weeks HFMF fell 0.16% on average, a down-week capture of 12.7%. Over the same 52 weeks HFMF returned +8.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 5.0 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, BTRN or HFMF?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, BTRN’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.21 with the S&P 500 and HFMF’s +0.20, so HFMF moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, BTRN or HFMF?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, BTRN averaged −0.64% and HFMF −0.16%, so HFMF returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, BTRN or HFMF?
Over the same weeks, BTRN finished 15.8 percentage points behind cash and HFMF finished 5.0 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, BTRN or HFMF?
BTRN charges 0.95% a year and HFMF charges 0.97%, so BTRN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTRN against HFMF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTRN against HFMF, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/btrn-vs-hfmf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources