Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AMZG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF

Aims to return twice the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)

One month to Sep 11, 2026: AMZG returned −9.5% where its own daily promise gave −8.2%, 1.3 points short.

Leverage Shares · Leveraged ETFs · data as of

Key facts

−3.9%What AMZN did
−8.2%What +2 times a day gives
−9.5%What the fund returned
−1.3 ptsThe fund itself cost

Method

4th of 6 leveraged and inverse ETFs by net assets

What it aimed at, and what it did

AMZG against its stated multipleOver the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMZN moved −3.9%. AMZG returned −9.5%, where 2 times that move implies −7.9%, a difference of −1.6 pts.+2x the move−7.9%AMZG returned−9.5%AMZN moved −3.9% over the same days

Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMZN moved −3.9%. AMZG returned −9.5%, where 2 times that move implies −7.9%. The difference is −1.6 pts.

Method

Period by period

AMZG over each window to Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowFundAMZN+2x the moveDifferenceAMZN moved about
1 month−9.5%−3.9%−7.9%−1.6 pts25%
Since launch+2.5%+4.4%+8.8%−6.3 pts46%

Method

The same trade from 4 issuers

Every fund that sets out to return +2 times AMZN, over the days all of them have been trading. Ranked by how close each came to its own stated multiple.

AMZN funds at +2x, to Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FundIssuerReturned+2x the moveDifference

Method

In plain words

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMZN's −3.9% implies −7.9%, which makes AMZG look 1.6 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZG aims to return +2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AMZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF), leveraged ETFs fields as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Sets out to return+2 times the daily move of AMZN, reset daily
Multiple a holder actually got over the window (ETFIQ)AMZN moved −3.9% over this window, too little to read a multiple from
UnderlyingAMZN
Segmentsingle stock, company
Net assets (issuer page, as of Sep 10, 2026)$1m
Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Jun 26, 2026)0.75%
LaunchedJul 7, 2026
Underlying volatility over the window (ETFIQ)25% annualized

Returns are ETFIQ calculations from Tiingo end-of-day prices, distributions reinvested, measured against the underlying over exactly the same days. How these figures are computed

Questions people ask

Did AMZG return +2 times AMZN?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMZN moved −3.9% and AMZG returned −9.5%. 2 times that move is −7.9%, so the fund came out 1.6 points short of it.
Why does AMZG not return +2 times over a year?
Because it resets daily. AMZG aims at +2 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what +2 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get.
Which +2x AMZN ETF tracked its stated multiple most closely?
4 issuers sell one. Over the days all of them have been trading, the table on this page ranks them by how far each finished from 2 times the underlying's move. ETFIQ does not rate funds; the order is the arithmetic.

The words on this page

Stated multiple
What the fund sets out to return against its underlying, each day. A fund at 2x aims to return twice the underlying’s daily move, and an inverse fund at -2x aims to return twice it in the opposite direction.
Daily reset
The fund starts each day aiming at the multiple again, from wherever it now stands. It is the mechanism that makes these funds behave as they do, and the reason the stated multiple applies to a day rather than to a holding period.
Compounding
Daily results multiply together rather than adding up. Two days of the multiple is not twice the multiple, and over a run of days the difference between the two grows with how far the underlying moves about.
Decay
What compounding costs a holder when the underlying falls and rises back to where it started. The underlying is level and the fund is down; the more violently it moved, the further down.
Difference against the stated multiple
The fund’s return minus the stated multiple times the underlying’s return, in percentage points. The one figure that says whether a holder got what the fund’s own multiple describes.

Every term used here, defined in full on the leveraged ETFs vocabulary page.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

Compare AMZG

Also against AMZZ.

Other funds on AMZN

Where to next

Put this on your own page

The label bar for AMZG, redrawn every trading night. Free to use with the credit link.

AMZG label bar, ETFIQ

Copy the embed code
<a href="https://etfiq.com/funds/AMZG"><img src="https://etfiq.com/embed/leverage/AMZG.svg" alt="AMZG label bar, ETFIQ" width="640"></a>
<p><a href="https://etfiq.com/funds/AMZG">AMZG label bar, updated daily by ETFIQ</a></p>

Where AMZG is written about

AMZG, Leveraged ETFs, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. ETFIQ is an independent publisher, is not a fund issuer, broker-dealer or investment adviser, and makes no recommendations.
Use this data, or open the live card

Open AMZG live on ETFIQ, where the figures refresh with the data.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMZG, leveraged ETFs, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/AMZG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How these figures are computed · Standards and sources