Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AMZG vs AMZO: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, AMZG finished 1.3 points short and AMZO 0.3 points over.

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+2.5%AMZG returned, 3 months
−24.8%AMZO returned, 3 months
−6.3 ptsAMZG from its stated multiple
−9.6 ptsAMZO from its stated multiple
AMZG1.6 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN −3.9% ×2 implies−7.9%AMZG returned−9.5%AMZN −3.9% ×2 implies−7.9%AMZG returned−9.5%
AMZO9.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN +7.6% ×2 implies−15.3%AMZO returned−24.8%AMZN +7.6% ×2 implies−15.3%AMZO returned−24.8%

Performance, window by window

AMZG and AMZO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AMZGAMZOAMZGAMZOAMZGAMZO
1 month−9.5%+6.9%−7.9%+7.9%−1.6 pts−0.9 pts
3 monthsnot published−24.8%not published−15.3%not published−9.6 pts
Since launch+2.5%−46.0%+8.8%−47.8%−6.3 pts+1.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AMZG and AMZO on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMZG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMZN Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
AMZO
Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
IssuerLeverage SharesTradr
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnAMZNAMZN
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−9.5%−24.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months−3.9%+7.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−7.9%−15.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.6 pts−9.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+2.5%−46.0%
Difference from stated, over that window−6.3 pts+1.8 pts
Underlying volatility25%44%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.6 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.75%1.49%
LaunchedJul 7, 2026Mar 24, 2026

AMZG in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: AMZG returned −9.5% where its own daily promise gave −8.2%, 1.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMZN's −3.9% implies −7.9%, which makes AMZG look 1.6 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZG aims to return +2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AMZO in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMZO returned −24.8% where its own daily promise gave −25.9%, 1.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times AMZN's 7.6% implies −15.3%, which makes AMZO look 9.6 points short. 10.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZO aims to return -2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 44% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AMZG or AMZO?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMZG finished 1.6 points from what its multiple implies and AMZO finished 9.6 points from its own, so AMZG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AMZG and AMZO levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Amazon.com, AMZG at +2 times and AMZO at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AMZG or AMZO?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AMZG’s moved at 25% annualized and AMZO’s at 44%, so AMZO has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AMZG or AMZO for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AMZG or AMZO?
AMZG charges 0.75% a year and AMZO charges 1.49%, so AMZG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AMZG against AMZO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMZG against AMZO, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AMZG-AMZO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources