Data as of .
PIEL vs SUPP: which is really different?
PIEL and SUPP hold 1% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: PIEL scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PIEL and SUPP hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | PIEL | SUPP |
|---|---|---|
| Waste Connections Inc | 0.65% | 1.24% |
| Only in PIEL | Only in SUPP |
|---|---|
| SK hynix Inc 9.81% | NVIDIA CORP 7.78% |
| ASML Holding NV 6.10% | TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR-SP ADR 7.62% |
| Novartis AG 4.89% | BROADCOM INC 7.10% |
| AstraZeneca PLC 4.58% | EATON CORP PLC 6.55% |
| Roche Holding AG 4.49% | FORGENT POWER SOLUTIONS INC 5.77% |
| LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitt 3.48% | MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS 5.28% |
| SAP SE 3.28% | LAM RESEARCH CORP 5.17% |
| Hermes International SCA 3.13% | TRANSDIGM GROUP INC 5.01% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIEL | SUPP | PIEL | SUPP | PIEL | SUPP | |
| 3 months | −6.1% | −11.9% | −8.3 pts | −14.2 pts | −3.6 pts | −9.4 pts |
| 6 months | +19.0% | +11.0% | +1.0 pts | −7.0 pts | −5.2 pts | −13.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.4% | not published | −6.1 pts | not published | −11.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +55.1% | not published | −23.3 pts | not published | −43.0 pts |
| Since launch | +11.8% | +53.9% | +0.2 pts | −39.0 pts | −4.5 pts | −84.3 pts |
| PIEL Pacer International Export Leaders ETF Holds 100 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF Holds 28 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 55% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Pacer | TCW |
| Theme | Reshoring and manufacturing | Reshoring and manufacturing |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 54.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 83.6% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 3.0% | 31.4% |
| Holdings | 100 | 28 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 45.7% | 59.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.75% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.49% | 0.90% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.8% (since launch on Dec 23, 2025) | +10.4% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +0.2 pts | −6.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −4.5 pts | −11.3 pts |
| Below its high | −6.1% | −12.8% |
| Net assets | $1m | $12m |
PIEL in plain words
By weight, 0% of PIEL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 46% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Since it launched on Dec 23, 2025 the fund returned +11.8% with distributions reinvested against +11.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 6.1% below its all-time high of Jun 18, 2026.
SUPP in plain words
By weight, 55% of SUPP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 28 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. It sits 12.8% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do PIEL and SUPP hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, PIEL or SUPP?
- PIEL has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SUPP has 55%, so PIEL differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, PIEL or SUPP?
- PIEL charges 0.49% a year and SUPP charges 0.75%, so PIEL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PIEL against SUPP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/piel-vs-supp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.