Data as of .
KMCA vs SUPL: which is really different?
KMCA and SUPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KMCA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KMCA and SUPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KMCA | Only in SUPL |
|---|---|
| SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 15.17% | DHL AG 5.05% |
| SK HYNIX INC 12.17% | UNION PACIFIC CORP 4.86% |
| SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 8.01% | CSX CORP 4.74% |
| DAEDUCK ELECTRONICS CO LTD 6.62% | NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORP 4.74% |
| ISUPETASYS COMPANY LTD 3.80% | CANADIAN NATL RAILWAY CO 4.67% |
| SAMSUNG SDI COMPANY LTD 3.72% | CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY 4.59% |
| HANMI SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANY LTD 3.25% | AMADEUS IT GROUP SA 4.58% |
| RAINBOW ROBOTICS INC 2.80% | FEDEX CORP 4.34% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMCA | SUPL | KMCA | SUPL | KMCA | SUPL | |
| 3 months | −19.3% | +0.1% | −21.5 pts | −2.1 pts | −16.8 pts | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +9.6% | not published | −8.4 pts | not published | −14.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +22.3% | not published | +5.7 pts | not published | +0.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +31.4% | not published | −47.0 pts | not published | −66.7 pts |
| Since launch | −12.4% | +30.9% | −17.0 pts | −49.4 pts | −16.3 pts | −78.2 pts |
| KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF Holds 35 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF Holds 40 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 29% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | PLUS | ProShares |
| Theme | Reshoring and manufacturing | Reshoring and manufacturing |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 28.6% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 8.1% |
| Holdings | 35 | 40 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.8% | 46.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.58% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.58% |
| Total return, 1 year | −12.4% (since launch on May 7, 2026) | +22.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −17.0 pts | +5.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −16.3 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Below its high | −20.2% | −6.8% |
| Net assets | $3m | $2m |
KMCA in plain words
By weight, 0% of KMCA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Since it launched on May 7, 2026 the fund returned −12.4% with distributions reinvested against +4.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 17.0 pts. It sits 20.2% below its all-time high of Jun 1, 2026.
SUPL in plain words
By weight, 29% of SUPL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 46% of the fund across 40 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.7 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Jul 17, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do KMCA and SUPL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KMCA or SUPL?
- KMCA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SUPL has 29%, so KMCA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KMCA or SUPL?
- KMCA charges 0.65% a year and SUPL charges 0.58%, so SUPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KMCA against SUPL, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kmca-vs-supl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.