Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FOWF vs WR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
FOWF and WR hold 16% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FOWF and WR
Net assets: $15m on Nov 3, 2026 for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF, and $932,169 on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. War Machine ETF.
75% of FOWF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 25% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
68% of WR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
WR costs 0.14 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FOWF | WR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026 | 7.2%, high on Oct 30, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Defense | Defense |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.2% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 3.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $15m | $974,606 |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 16% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FOWF and WR hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
16% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FOWF | WR | FOWF | WR |
| 3 months | −5.9% | +2.8% | −5.3 pts vs URTH | not measured |
| 6 months | +3.4% | +6.4% | −0.9 pts vs URTH | not measured |
| 1 year | +12.2% | – | −3.0 pts vs URTH | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: FOWF Dec 2024 · WR May 2026 | +44.8% | +6.4% | +8.0 pts vs URTH | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
16% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
FOWF
By weight, 75% of FOWF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 91 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.2% for its benchmark, the MSCI World Index, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.
WR
By weight, 68% of WR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 56 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on May 6, 2026 the fund returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.2% below its all-time high of Oct 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do FOWF and WR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FOWF against WR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fowf-vs-wr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FOWF against WR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fowf-vs-wr
[FOWF against WR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fowf-vs-wr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.