Do CRTC and DRES hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CRTC or DRES?

CRTC has 87% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRES has 56%, so DRES differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CRTC or DRES?

CRTC charges 0.35% a year and DRES charges 0.50%, so CRTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

CRTC vs DRES: which is really different?

CRTC and DRES hold 2% of their weight in the same names. Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF.

86.6%

CRTC in the S&P 500

55.8%

DRES in the S&P 500

+14.7%

CRTC total return, 1 year

+13.6%

DRES total return, since launch

CRTC · 1 year to Sep 30, 202613% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

87% of CRTC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 13% is outside the index

DRES · 6 months to Sep 30, 202644% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

56% of DRES's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 44% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · DRES scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

CRTC 1.2

DRES 53.2

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CRTC and DRES hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

50%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CRTC DRES

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 0.57% 1.51%

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 0.38% 3.49%

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.28% 1.56%

NUCOR CORP 0.26% 2.23%

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION INC 0.24% 2.72%

VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 0.17% 3.62%

MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC 0.16% 3.73%

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.16% 1.84%

Only in CRTC

ALPHABET INC 5.13%

MICROSOFT CORP 5.00%

AMAZON.COM INC 4.89%

NVIDIA CORP 4.60%

META PLATFORMS INC 4.40%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 3.91%

EXXON MOBIL CORP 2.82%

CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.22%

Only in DRES

Union Pacific Corp 5.28%

WillScot Holdings Corp 3.81%

Carlisle Cos Inc 3.74%

Clean Harbors Inc 3.60%

ConocoPhillips 3.55%

Jacobs Solutions Inc 3.53%

Fluor Corp 3.45%

Eagle Materials Inc 3.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	CRTC	DRES	CRTC	DRES	CRTC	DRES
3 months	+6.6%	−8.5%	+4.0 pts	−11.0 pts	+4.5 pts	−10.6 pts
6 months	+16.5%	+0.2%	−0.5 pts	−16.8 pts	−10.4 pts	−26.7 pts
1 year	+14.7%	not published	−1.0 pts	not published	−9.1 pts	not published
Since launch CRTC Nov 2023 · DRES Oct 2025	+70.6%	+13.6%	−5.1 pts	−1.8 pts	−24.4 pts	−9.7 pts

CRTC and DRES over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CRTC

Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF · Holds 216 stocks in energy security and critical technology, 87% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

DRES

GMO Domestic Resilience ETF · Holds 38 stocks in energy security and critical technology, 56% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Xtrackers GMO

Theme Energy security and critical technology Energy security and critical technology

In the S&P 500 86.6% 55.8%

Active share vs the S&P 500 61.6% 98.2%

In the Nasdaq-100 51.1% 6.7%

Holdings 216 38

Top ten, share of the fund 36.6% 37.8%

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.50%

Fee for the differing part 0.57% 0.51%

Total return, 1 year +14.7% +13.6% (since launch on Oct 1, 2025)

vs the S&P 500 −1.0 pts −1.8 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −9.1 pts −9.7 pts

Below its high −0.5% −11.9%

Net assets $144m $36m

CRTC and DRES on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CRTC in plain words

By weight, 87% of CRTC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 62%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 216 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +14.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts.

DRES in plain words

By weight, 56% of DRES's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 38 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Since it launched on Oct 1, 2025 the fund returned +13.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 1.8 pts. It sits 11.9% below its all-time high of Aug 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CRTC and DRES hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CRTC or DRES?: CRTC has 87% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRES has 56%, so DRES differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CRTC or DRES?: CRTC charges 0.35% a year and DRES charges 0.50%, so CRTC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CRTC vs IETC CRTC vs NSI CRTC vs TSES DRES vs IETC DRES vs NSI DRES vs TSES

CRTC on its own →DRES on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CRTC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CRTC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Xtrackers website ↗DRES filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DRES prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GMO website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CRTC against DRES, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/crtc-vs-dres

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.