Data as of .
URA vs XME: which is really different?
URA and XME hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and XME returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: URA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URA and XME hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in URA | Only in XME |
|---|---|
| CAMECO CORP 22.39% | Uranium Energy Corp 4.76% |
| SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.46% | Hecla Mining Co 4.62% |
| NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.88% | Centrus Energy Corp 4.60% |
| OKLO INC 5.12% | USA Rare Earth Inc 4.47% |
| URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.72% | Coeur Mining Inc 4.46% |
| NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.42% | MP Materials Corp 4.41% |
| PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.15% | Freeport-McMoRan Inc 4.26% |
| ENERGY FUELS INC 3.09% | Royal Gold Inc 4.26% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| URA | XME | URA | XME | URA | XME | |
| 3 months | −4.4% | −5.6% | −7.7 pts | −8.9 pts | −3.6 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 6 months | −11.7% | +4.3% | −27.7 pts | −11.7 pts | −32.4 pts | −16.3 pts |
| 1 year | +7.0% | +32.5% | −10.5 pts | +15.0 pts | −15.9 pts | +9.6 pts |
| 3 years | +100.1% | +123.5% | +22.2 pts | +45.6 pts | +5.0 pts | +28.4 pts |
| Since launch | −34.6% | +160.8% | −758.0 pts | −643.6 pts | −1460.8 pts | −1513.1 pts |
| URA Global X Uranium ETF Holds 58 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XME State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF Holds 41 stocks in miners and metals, 17% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | State Street |
| Theme | Nuclear and uranium | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 17.3% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.6% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 58 | 41 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.9% | 46.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.35% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.0% | +32.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −10.5 pts | +15.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −15.9 pts | +9.6 pts |
| Below its high | −50.4% | −14.4% |
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. It sits 50.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
XME in plain words
By weight, 17% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +32.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 15.0 pts. It sits 14.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do URA and XME hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or XME?
- URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XME has 17%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, URA or XME?
- URA charges 0.69% a year and XME charges 0.35%, so XME is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against XME, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/URA-XME Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.