Data as of .
AIRR vs URA: which is really different?
AIRR and URA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AIRR returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: URA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 349 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, AIRR and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in AIRR | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 6.00% | CAMECO CORP 22.39% |
| ARGAN INC 4.73% | SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.46% |
| COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC 4.42% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.88% |
| MASTEC INC 4.18% | OKLO INC 5.12% |
| CH ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC 4.08% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.72% |
| OWENS CORNING 3.90% | NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.42% |
| DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC 3.76% | PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.15% |
| EMCOR GROUP INC 3.75% | ENERGY FUELS INC 3.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIRR | URA | AIRR | URA | AIRR | URA | |
| 3 months | −17.1% | −4.4% | −20.4 pts | −7.7 pts | −16.3 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | −1.1% | −11.7% | −17.1 pts | −27.7 pts | −21.8 pts | −32.4 pts |
| 1 year | +15.0% | +7.0% | −2.5 pts | −10.5 pts | −8.0 pts | −15.9 pts |
| 3 years | +102.4% | +100.1% | +24.5 pts | +22.2 pts | +7.3 pts | +5.0 pts |
| Since launch | +460.7% | −34.6% | +56.4 pts | −758.0 pts | −312.8 pts | −1460.8 pts |
| AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF Holds 58 stocks in reshoring and manufacturing, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | URA Global X Uranium ETF Holds 58 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Reshoring and manufacturing | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.5% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 58 | 58 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 30.4% | 60.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.0% | +7.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −2.5 pts | −10.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −8.0 pts | −15.9 pts |
| Below its high | −19.5% | −50.4% |
AIRR in plain words
By weight, 6% of AIRR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 30% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +15.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. It sits 19.5% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. It sits 50.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do AIRR and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, AIRR or URA?
- AIRR has 6% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, AIRR or URA?
- AIRR charges 0.69% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so AIRR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AIRR against URA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/AIRR-URA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.