Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
COPX vs URA
2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and URA hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COPX | URA |
|---|---|---|
| BHP GROUP LIMITED | 4.92% | 2.21% |
| Only in COPX | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| Lundin Mining Corporation 6.07% | CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% |
| GLENCORE PLC 6.00% | Oklo Inc 7.31% |
| Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd. 5.98% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 5.82% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 5.06% | Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. 4.95% | Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% |
| ANTOFAGASTA PLC 4.87% | ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% |
| Teck Resources Limited 4.86% | DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | URA | COPX | URA | COPX | URA | |
| 3 months | +12.8% | +1.7% | +8.1 pts | −3.0 pts | +10.7 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.8% | −5.6% | −1.4 pts | −20.7 pts | −6.4 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +85.6% | +19.6% | +65.7 pts | −0.4 pts | +60.0 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | +153.8% | +112.1% | +75.8 pts | +34.1 pts | +60.3 pts | +18.6 pts |
| Since launch | +191.0% | −30.8% | −559.9 pts | −760.5 pts | −1371.8 pts | −1465.7 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Global X |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 5.1% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 39 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +85.6% | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +65.7 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +60.0 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −6.0% | −47.6% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +85.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 65.7 pts. It sits 6.0% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do COPX and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or URA?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or URA?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so COPX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/COPX-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.