Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
FDN vs URA
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDN and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDN | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.84% | CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.79% | Oklo Inc 7.31% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.22% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 6.19% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 5.21% | Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% |
| Booking Holdings Inc. 4.91% | Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.78% | ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% |
| Oracle Corporation 4.52% | DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 4, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDN | URA | FDN | URA | FDN | URA | |
| 3 months | +7.0% | +1.7% | +2.3 pts | −3.0 pts | +4.9 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +18.1% | −5.6% | +2.9 pts | −20.7 pts | −2.1 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +3.8% | +19.6% | −16.2 pts | −0.4 pts | −21.8 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | +69.7% | +112.1% | −8.3 pts | +34.1 pts | −23.8 pts | +18.6 pts |
| Since launch | +1039.1% | −30.8% | +227.8 pts | −760.5 pts | −644.9 pts | −1465.7 pts |
| FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Internet and e-commerce | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 82.7% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 85.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 57.3% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 42 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 60.6% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.57% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −16.2 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −21.8 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −1.5% | −47.6% |
FDN in plain words
By weight, 83% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 42 positions, as filed for Sep 3, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.2 pts.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do FDN and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or URA?
- FDN has 83% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FDN or URA?
- FDN charges 0.49% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDN against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/FDN-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.