ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.

ARTY vs URA

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF and Global X Uranium ETF, side by side on the themes desk.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ARTY and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ARTYOnly in URA
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.39%CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 5.24%Oklo Inc 7.31%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.84%NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. 4.54%URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.37%Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81%
COREWEAVE, INC. 4.27%Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33%
BROADCOM INC. 4.25%ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24%
SK hynix Inc. 3.63%DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ARTY and URA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
ARTYURAARTYURAARTYURA
3 months+7.9%+1.7%+3.2 pts−3.0 pts+5.8 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+58.8%−5.6%+43.6 pts−20.7 pts+38.6 pts−25.7 pts
1 year+79.1%+19.6%+59.1 pts−0.4 pts+53.5 pts−6.0 pts
3 years+137.7%+112.1%+59.7 pts+34.1 pts+44.2 pts+18.6 pts
Since launch+243.1%−30.8%+21.8 pts−760.5 pts−99.4 pts−1465.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ARTY and URA on the themes desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
IssueriSharesGlobal X
ThemeArtificial intelligenceNuclear and uranium
In the S&P 50049.7%0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 50084.1%100.0%
In the Nasdaq-10036.5%0.0%
Holdings6152
Top ten, share of the fund42.9%66.1%
Expense rationot published0.69%
Fee for the differing partnot published0.69%
Total return, 1 year+79.1%+19.6%
vs the S&P 500+59.1 pts−0.4 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100+53.5 pts−6.0 pts
Below its high−5.6%−47.6%

ARTY in plain words

By weight, 50% of ARTY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 43% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +79.1% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 59.1 pts. It sits 5.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

URA in plain words

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Do ARTY and URA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ARTY or URA?
ARTY has 50% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ARTY against URA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ARTY against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ARTY-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources