Data as of . Every figure is the themes desk's own, on published data.
TAN vs URA
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TAN and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in TAN | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| First Solar, Inc. 11.74% | CAMECO CORPORATION 23.14% |
| Nextpower Inc. 9.81% | Oklo Inc 7.31% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. 8.75% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.27% |
| Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 7.58% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 5.79% |
| SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 6.32% | Joint stock company National atomic comp 4.81% |
| Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 5.09% | Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 4.33% |
| Sunrun Inc. 4.83% | ENERGY FUELS INCORPORATED 4.24% |
| O.Y. Nofar Energy Ltd. 4.21% | DAEWOO ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO., L 4.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | URA | TAN | URA | TAN | URA | |
| 3 months | −25.0% | +1.7% | −29.7 pts | −3.0 pts | −27.1 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | −9.8% | −5.6% | −25.0 pts | −20.7 pts | −30.0 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +14.3% | +19.6% | −5.6 pts | −0.4 pts | −11.3 pts | −6.0 pts |
| 3 years | −16.7% | +112.1% | −94.7 pts | +34.1 pts | −110.2 pts | +18.6 pts |
| Since launch | −38.6% | −30.8% | −850.0 pts | −760.5 pts | −1722.7 pts | −1465.7 pts |
| TAN Invesco Solar ETF | URA Global X Uranium ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | Global X |
| Theme | Clean energy | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 11.7% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 31 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 65.2% | 66.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.70% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.70% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +19.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −5.6 pts | −0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −11.3 pts | −6.0 pts |
| Below its high | −60.4% | −47.6% |
TAN in plain words
By weight, 12% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.6 pts. It sits 60.4% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do TAN and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, TAN or URA?
- TAN has 12% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so TAN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, TAN or URA?
- TAN charges 0.70% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so URA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TAN against URA, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/TAN-URA.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.